ChristianMan72

Active Members
  • Content count

    217
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

477 Excellent

About ChristianMan72

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    US
  • Interests
    Many things and have been to many places in this world. I'm in my early 40's and still chaste. Open to questions, chat, and sincere discussion.

Recent Profile Visitors

2,747 profile views
  1. Emergency medical stuff, sure, especially if you present it as something you are trusting but not burdening them with. Many men like to be caring and protective and sometimes even the hero. It would be far better to tell them about it beforehand than try to explain after! A proper, caring-type guy would not mind you telling him that. I was thinking more of female medical stuff or idle discussions about past operations or procedures that are not highly relevant, but maybe that's just me.
  2. Would you be insulted..

    The only instance where I might consider it would be if either of us were disproportionately wealthy or a public figure, or had some sort of complicated inheritance/trust fund and/or children from a previous marriage. Then it might help make it clear to everyone else that your love was for each other, not for money or assets that could become part of a marriage. But that's all unlikely, and I don't see a need for it otherwise.
  3. Honesty is absolutely essential, in my opinion. Finding out that someone misled you can undo trust very quickly. It is far harder to earn trust than to lose it. However, there is such a thing as mystery. Tell the important stuff, incl. WTM, and lead into with some other topics, but don't give it all away at once. Leave some stuff for the guy to ask about. Obviously, you need to find a balance, but I tend to not to tell all my experiences and stuff until people actually want to know. And there are some topics that women don't realize are TMI for men until they are specifically interested in you, e.g. like some medical stuff. I joined (and later left) a couple dating sites out of curiosity and tried to learn a bit about what women say they like and want in a guy/relationship, but I am too private to put my photo up... and that reduces response exponentially, at least for guys.
  4. What kind of school do you want to send your future kids to?

    Home-school would be my preference. From what I've seen it has the potential to turn out self-motivated, intelligent, hard-working types. I think the so-called social drawbacks are exaggerated. Many of the early home school types were out of necessity and were often either remotely located or moved around so much that they would have had social challenges anyway. And a certain percentage of people just are socially challenged, public/state school is probably not going to change that, but only make it worse anyway. It isn't that hard to home school children once they get used to figuring more things out for themselves, and with the reference material available on the Internet now and the range of home school support groups around, I don't really see the down side.
  5. Controversial Topics

    I wouldn't mind such a forum, provided one of the rules was that it isn't just another opinion thread. Participants should have to substantiate their claims with reference material or links to references (or really well-explained reasoning). Sometimes members make wild claims and insist in post after post that they are right but refuse to back it up at all. And while I don't mind who names it, maybe it should include the word 'debate' in its description or title... e.g. Controversy and Debates forum because we would still want everyone to behave respectfully. Personal attacks, insults and snide remarks really should have no place here.
  6. Viewer's Undiscretion

    I appreciate and understand the replies from CF, BW and SM. I agree that anything posted in the main forums is open game to anyone, that's the nature of a forum. And the admins do a pretty good job of keeping random stuff out, I don't know if I've ever seen spam or an advert on this site, which is pretty admirable! There are insulting posts to be found, including ones that call people out by name or quote them and insinuate that the author is stupid. Few of our members are professional writers and many are young and passionate about what they believe, but that doesn't make them stupid. What happened to chivalry and respect? State your disagreement, sure. Ask someone to clarify what they said, sure. But don't belittle those you don't agree with. Some of the atheists/agnostics take offence at Christian posts and assume we're trying to convert them. My posts are not placed there to try to proselytize those who don't believe, but to explain to and encourage those who do believe. There may be more conservative Christians here by membership, but they are, in my experience, not the loudest or most abundant voices. But as I said before, I'm thinking out loud, neither making a formal request nor a complaint. Maybe we can all just try a little harder to treat the other members with respect, even when we don't agree.
  7. Viewer's Undiscretion

    It was probably a couple months on the site before I ventured into the VD forum, and I still avoid it for the most part. There is enough detail to the discussions outside of the VD forums, and some of the topics there are just... idle talk in my opinion, probably the result of a generation inured to such detail by instant access to hard, hard, strange porn unlike any known generation before. As a still single guy, I don't need to think about and ponder some of those things just yet, and they could be troubling to some gentler souls as well. Were I engaged or married, of course, my view towards the forum would probably be a bit different. It probably falls more to parents to protect their children than the forum/site admins. However, I tend to try to be responsible to everyone, and if it was my responsibility to manage, I would probably try to restrict the sections with graphic descriptions to those who requested access, like the guy-only/girl-only forums. Then at least we don't end up stumbling on vivid physical descriptions of things that some of us would rather find out for ourselves one day. And if you wanted to limit the age of entry to say 16 or 18, it wouldn't stop people from lying about their age and getting in, but it would be doing a kind of due diligence. On a similar topic, sometimes I wonder if a Christian-access forum might be of value. Not for the majority of posts and topics, but as a safe place for Christian waiters to ask Christian questions without having their beliefs attacked or derided in the process. The tone of the forums have in my opinion swayed enough this last while that many Christian waiters have stopped posting and some have simply left the site. That said, I appreciate the site's existence and am not demanding anything, just thinking out loud.
  8. Men Making Decisions

    Hey 29K, There is a context to that verse in 1 Timothy. This is in the context of a spiritual meeting, like in a church. In a church, men are supposed to be subject to the authority of whoever is preaching. In line with my post above, if a married woman is subject to her husband as the spiritual head of the home, it is out of the order of things for her to jump up and start communicating for the two of them in a spiritual matter, thus assuming his role. She is part of her husband, and so it is disrespectful to him. What she has to say is not blocked, but in this specific place and role, she should show her husband the respect by asking him first, and then letting him ask on their behalf as a couple. The Bible is full of order and respect, very different from the world today. So, it would be incorrect to assume that this scripture is saying women cannot speak in public, or teach in schools or cannot have opinions. I won't get into detail, but the Bible doesn't generally 'condone' any of the things you listed. You can't just write off the Bible because of some of the details in the stories presented. And there are some actions or near-actions that occurred because they were symbolic, and need to be understood in context. Some of the things may be difficult to understand, and some of them may not be what people want to hear. But that doesn't make them wrong.
  9. Trying to Better Understand Theism and Religion

    I'll try to answer these as one. If you believe that your scriptures are inerrant: why is that? If you believe in scriptures over secular science and history: why? If you believe that your scriptures are fallible: how do you decide what is absolute truth, and what is just a story? If you seek to reconcile scriptures and science/history: how do you? A Christian chooses to accept that the Bible is the Word of God. Who actually wrote down all of the words is beside the point; either way we believe the Bible is the spiritually inspired Word of God. Without that faith, there is no way to discuss spiritual things on an equal footing, because that is the foundation. So, if for a moment, you can assume that frame of mind, a 'willing suspension of disbelief', read on. True science and the Bible do not disagree, because God created everything, He would not put something contrary to the truth in His Word. A lot of major scientific understandings originated in inspirations from the Bible. So where scientists claim that the Bible is wrong, we have to look closely and perhaps be patient. Man's knowledge of science grows every day, and man's understanding of things in science that seemed in contradiction often changes later. And of course there is just a fair bit of pseudo-science out there. True science is based on being able to reproduce the environment and experiment in any laboratory before believing something as true. But things like evolution and some of the dating techniques (err, not whether to go to dinner or a movie, but deciding how old a bone or fossil is) are wild guesses. Evolution has never had any 'proof' that stood up to the test of time and further analysis. None of the many missing links have ever been found. Not even a single cell has ever been observed to evolve, and believe me, they have tried. And the age of rocks and fossils cannot be truly scientific because no scientist can actually go back in time to prove that the environment and the experiment are correct. That is especially true of the environment, which has to be exactly the same for most of the aging algorithms to work. Evolution is actually a religion itself, because it takes a faith in something that can never be proven physically. Except that many times through history, the followers of evolution have falsified their findings in an attempt to help prove it. Many of these have been later proven to be hoaxes, but apparently some of them are still left in textbooks as 'proof'. I think some of this stems from the fact that many of the atheists who once had some belief in Christianity have an anger or hatred against God, or at least a strong dislike for all things religion and go out of their way to try to disprove it. Of course, not all atheists are the same, no offence intended. As for history, again, the Bible is generally not in contradiction to what was recorded elsewhere, or has been discovered. In fact, tons of historical finds corroborate the Bible account. But sometimes patience is needed. For instance, French historian Voltaire ridiculed the Bible because it spoke of the Hittites but no evidence of them had ever been found. Apparently at the time, the Encyclopedia Britannica referred to the Hittites as "a mythological civilization mentioned only in the Bible." But in 1876, they were discovered by archaeologists with a tremendous amount of writings and other items that proved their existence. And sadly today, there are people who rewrite and reinterpret much more recent history to suit their own agenda, e.g. Howard Zinn. As far as understanding the Bible and what is symbolic vs what is literal, that takes most of all a spiritual approach. Most of the passages that are symbolic are pretty clearly stated as such. And specifically, Adam and Eve, and Noah are literal history, not parables. And like anything in life, you cannot lift a few words or a phrase out of context to prove the Bible wrong. Nor can you use a few words to create a Bible doctrine, as many do today, e.g. 'judge not that ye be not judged' is widely misquoted. You have to study out all of the scriptures on a topic and see how they work together, because they all do. When you love God and love His Word, you really want to understand what He means, not just try to make the Bible say what you want it to say. There are things that we don't know the exact meaning or shape of in the Bible history, but they are not the kinds of details that are essential to our everyday lives, they don't change the principle teachings of the Bible. For example, we don't have to know exactly why or how people in early Genesis used to live hundreds of years in order to believe the rest of the Bible. It is a point of interest, but doesn't change what we believe and obey. I am not trying to start any arguments, just to answer SM's questions. If someone else wants to argue something I've said, please start a separate thread out of respect for the SM's original question here.
  10. Men Making Decisions

    I understand what Jasmine is saying, though some people today are so far removed from true Christianity, or believe such a watered down version that it sounds foreign. I don't want to get into an argument, but I will briefly try to explain this from my own understanding of it. When God created Eve, it was to fulfill a need because Adam was alone, and no animal was capable of filling that need. She was created to be a part of Adam's life. Nevertheless, while a woman remains single, she is free to make her own decisions. And women are considered spiritually equal before God, married or not. But men and women are not physically equal, not in design (thank God) nor in physical strength. When a woman enters a Christian marriage, her role changes. She doesn't become a lesser person, or have less value nor should she in any way be oppressed (unlike the teachings of some religions, e.g. the LDS or Islam). But she does become subject to her husband as God has given him the role of spiritual leader and the one responsible for final decision making in the marriage. She is not less spiritual, nor should she be. She is not excluded from decisions either, her input is vitally important because the two of them become one flesh in God's eyes. But the husband has the responsibility before God for what they do and how they live as a couple. It is pretty much common sense, e.g. there is only one president, because if there were two equal presidents, who would cast the tie-breaking vote? There are never an equal number of judges on a panel or in a court, because then some things could never be decided. There is more to it. A wife's role is not to chase whatever she wants in the world for herself 'so long as she is back in time for dinner'. By marrying, her role has changed and she is now responsible to seek the best for her marriage and family above everything else (except serving God, which always comes first). And the husband now has additional responsibility, to care for and love and protect his wife as if she was his own body. It is a most wonderful thing, a Christian marriage. To further understand all of this, consider that all three participants in 'the fall' received a 'curse' or 'judgment' from God. The serpent tempted Eve and she ate of the forbidden fruit, and then gave it to Adam too. You can look up and read the serpents curse if you like. Eve's curse from Genesis 3: 16 To the woman he said, “I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.†Adam was also cursed, because he chose to eat the fruit with Eve: 17 To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’ “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life. 18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field. 19 By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return.†The curse on the ground was mitigated after the Flood, but that's another topic. And while I already know that some of you disagree, these events are not myths or parables, they did happen. Not because I say so, but because that is how the Bible is written, including listing Adam as the first man in the genealogies. If someone wants to respectfully discuss this further from a Christian standpoint, feel free to start a thread in the religion forum, or PM me (please be patient with me for a response).
  11. What If I'm A Virgin?

    If a guy asks this question in hopes of persuading a woman to be his next score... he's the wrong guy. However, if he asks it because he too is WTM, then it wouldn't really be awkward or a problem. This video is full of half truths. "A woman's v/virginity is not her greatest gift to the world" - which is true and that is why she shouldn't plan to give it to the world. But contrary to what this video guy says, it is a great gift to her husband (and her children by way of example). It is a gift to herself too, because she won't have regrets and distracting memories and STDs and the awkwardness of discussing past bedfellows with her husband. OK, I quit before I got to the end of the video, this pretty boy is trying to speak out of both sides of his mouth. Something like, sex is not special enough to be saved, but it is so special that we're all missing out, we really 'need' to learn to enjoy a moment of passion in a strange hookup. I'll venture a guess that he is lonely and unhappy in his quiet hours. The whole point of WTM isn't just that one first physical union, and some people do get hung up on that. The real point (in my opinion) is where your heart is, in wanting to be true and loyal to and pure for that one person that you will truly love and want to spend the rest of your life with. Sex is small in a way, yes, it doesn't compare to the bigger picture of love and loyalty. But that doesn't make sex outside of marriage into a toy. I think that WTM is less sincere if it is just avoiding one specific physical action, but allows all else. I believe it is more sincere to make a practice of avoiding the casual mental and visual and interpersonal stuff that presents itself along the way too. I'm not WTM because I think sex is bad or dirty or strange or that the first time is that big of a deal. I'm WTM because I want that unencumbered spiritual union with another soul, that relationship of love, trust and loyalty until death do us part. I'm not WTM for a 'great' first time. I'm WTM for the great times we will have together for the rest of our lives.
  12. controlling yourself

    You can keep proclaiming it, but that will never make it true. And I absolutely do believe in Noah's ark and Adam and Eve. Of course fornication is a sin. The earth isn't more than about 6,000 years old, and marriage was part of God's plan right from the beginning. Gen 2:24 For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh. Exactly. IRH, I'm starting to think that only a troll would claim to be waiting until marriage, and claim to be a Christian and yet consistently criticize and mock both topics. I'm think I'm done with this thread.
  13. Should Men Give Up Porn?

    Start with this one: http://yourbrainonporn.com/neural-correlates-sexual-cue-reactivity-individuals-and-without-compulsive-sexual-behaviours-2014 This one's also interesting: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/therapy-matters/201205/does-porn-contribute-ed Then read through this list if you would like some more references: http://www.yourbrainonporn.com/porn-induced-ed-media
  14. controlling yourself

    No. There is no proof of that or any way to prove it. And the Bible clearly tells us there is a difference between mankind and animals.
  15. I hear what you are saying. My point is that you can't be a Christian from your head only. It has to involve your heart and your soul. Without a conversion of the heart, it is all vain jangling. These periods of extra study and of questioning faith before rejecting God are because these ones have allowed doubts to settle into their hearts and separate them from God. Once that happens, unless they can overcome the questions and get back to the heart of their faith, just studying the Bible for facts and meaning will not resolve their doubt.